This removes some abuse of power by the prosecution in the types of sentences they offer when offering a plea bargain. When mandatory sentencing was first implemented in the US justice system in the 1980s, there was a significant decline in crime throughout all categories as the sentences were handed down. The seizure of 3,906 pounds of cocaine, valued then at over $100 million wholesale, from a Miami International Airport hangar on March 9, 1982, brought about the public's awareness of the Medellin Cartel, Colombian drug traffickers working together, and changed U.S. law enforcement's approach towards the drug trade. These sentences stipulate a minimum period of incarceration that people convicted of selected crimes must serve (p.80). For mandatory sentencing, it helps create a standard of justice that can be applied equally to all parties that are charged with similar crimes. 2. Along with these unjust punishments, mandatory minimum sentencing shows to be a waste of public taxes for keeping inmates imprisoned. Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Sentencing 837 Words | 4 Pages. Sometimes, the system works very well, but its benefits are not always so apparent in other times. The other major advantage of federal sentencing guidelines is that they make sentencing more predictable and transparent. 11 Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pros and Cons – Vittana.org This bill was never enacted.Â. Although there are people who commit crimes without conscience or care for the law, there is also a large per cent of the population that is dissuaded from criminal acts due to the fear of consequences, such as incarceration. Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Minimum Sentencing 2594 Words | 11 Pages. Though, the judge felt it was irrational and unjust. Mandatory minimum sentences raise serious issues of public policy and routinely result in excessively severe sentences. The three strikes law pros and cons show that it can provide a just result when applied appropriately. It triggers a shift in personal bias. 8 Reasons Why Marijuana Should Be Legalized. Mandatory minimum sentences were established as the response to complaints from politicians and the public that offenders weren’t serving long enough terms for their convictions. Mandatory sentencing has been observed in a variety of jurisdictions as a deterrent for criminals to repeat their offences. 0. Dennis W. Archer, former Detroit mayor and Michigan Supreme Court Justice takes the position that "it is time for America to stop getting tougher and start getting smarter against crime by reassessing mandatory sentencing and irrevocable prison terms." Pros--Judges have limited, if any, discretion so everyone is treated the same which can be good and can be bad. Proponents argue that a lack of sentencing guidelines opens up the system to corruption. Discuss the sentencing dispositions in your jurisdiction. Because while there's little question that ending mandatory sentencing guidelines makes for a more just system, such changes are meaningless in the presence of systemic and institutionalized discrimination in that same system. Proposals for the United States to implement mandatory national service, a requirement that people serve in the military or complete other works of service, trace back to the 1800s. Montaldo, Charles. Wiki User April 28, 2013 6:52PM . Other critics of mandatory sentencing feel that the money spent in longer incarceration has not been beneficial in the war against drugs and could be better spent on other programs designed to fight drug abuse. It includes mandatory sentencing of 10 years to life in prison for any person age 21 or over who attempts or conspires to offer drugs (including marijuana) to someone younger than 18 years old. Opponents to the mandatory sentencing feel that such punishment is unjust and does not allow for flexibility in the judicial process of prosecuting and sentencing individuals. Understanding Organized Crime and the RICO Act, What Is Extradition? But with mandatory sentencing, uniform sentences are guaranteed throughout the justice system, so offenders will be punished based upon their overall moral culpability. Pros and cons of sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentences and other kinds of academic papers in our essays database at Many Essays. Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws. The guidelines ignore things like the race or economic status of the defendant. When low-level criminals are threatened with high-level mandatory sentences, they would often say or do something to get out of multiple years serving in prison. Read this Miscellaneous Research Paper and over 89,000 other research documents. It encourages an environment where coercion exists. Many states have begun to use alternatives to imprisonment for drug offenders—usually called "drug courts"—in which defendants are sentenced into treatment programs, rather than jail. By the early 1990’s, these laws existed in all 50 states (Bjerk, 2005). These laws made jail terms mandatory for drug dealers and anyone in possession of certain amounts of illegal drugs. Modern propositions for compulsory service envision that young Americans could join the military or do civilian projects such as teaching in low-income areas, helping care for the … In theory, mandatory minimum sentences can help law-enforcement officials to move up the chain of command in organized crime. 2. Judges need to have the discretion to weigh the specifics of the cases before them and determine an appropriate sentence. This article presents a couple interesting points about the pros and cons of mandatory minimums. These intransigent sentencing laws may appear as universally adaptable and a quick solution for crime. In the US, each of the 300 million people have a unique opinion on any given subject, and this is true in any justice system. 1. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws have gained popularity in the United States over the last couple of decades. 1. The bust also sparked new life into the War on Drugs. (Roche, 1999) Pros: Common belief of the Australian public is, with a minimum mandatory sentence It triggers a shift in personal bias. It does not include the sympathy factor. 1-888-302-2840 1-888-422-8036 I think the author made a strong point when discussing how mandatory minimums remove some discretion from the prosecution. It helps to eliminate personal bias. Without such mandatory sentencing, defendants in the past, guilty of virtually the same offenses under the same circumstances, have received vastly different sentences in the same jurisdiction, and in some cases from the same judge. After being caught, the judge sentenced her to a 10-year mandatory sentence as dictated by law. There are certainly some definite pros and cons to mandatory sentencing, and here are some of them: 1. ThoughtCo. Sentencing used to be in the hands of a jury or judge, but with mandatory sentencing, a guilty verdict would mean that prosecutors are given more control of the sentence the offenders would receive. Montaldo, Charles. Mandatory Sentencing Pros And Cons. In one certain case, a desperate mother of four children was paid 100 dollars to send an unknown package to someone, without knowing that it contained crack cocaine. Kofi Annan: Importance of Youth Leadership, Youth Leadership in Community Development, Taking Youth Leadership to the Next Level, How We Are Helping Chinese Disabled Youth, Front Loading Washing Machines Pros and Cons List, Flat Organisational Structure Pros and Cons List, 22 Good Songs for 18th Birthday Slideshow, 35 Good Songs For 50th Birthday Slideshow, 57 Good Parents Entrance Songs for Wedding Reception, 23 Bible Verses About Death Of a Grandmother, 6 Profound Pros and Cons of Legalizing Drugs, 19 Primary Pros and Cons of Legalizing Weed, 42 Good Songs for 70th Birthday Slideshow. I need at least 1 pro and 3 cons for Mandatory Sentencing. While many citizens support such laws many view them as inherently biased against African Americans. 2. Mandatory sentencing legislation was introduced in the 1990s in the Northern Territory and Western Australia. 2) Criminals will know what punishment they will get if they commit a crime, so it may stop them from committing it. In an article posted on the ABA website, he states, "The idea that Congress can dictate a one-size-fits-all sentencing scheme does not make sense. It eliminates the sympathy factor. What Are the Pros of Mandatory Minimum Sentences? It helps with decreasing crime. It has also been incorporated into certain statutes to stop specific crimes from happening, such as those related to drugs or guns. The mandatory minimum sentencing law provides a judge with a set minimum sentences based on the charges against the defendant. It encourages an environment where coercion exists. "The bottom line is that only decision makers who are very myopic would find long sentences to be appealing," said study leader Jonathan Caulkins of Rand's Drug Policy Research Center. In this article, we will look at the pros and cons of determinate sentencing, and learn how it … Related Questions. One reason mandatory sentencing guidelines are established is to increase sentencing uniformity—to guarantee that defendants, who commit similar crimes and have similar criminal backgrounds, receive similar sentences. Mandatory sentencing refers to the practice of parliament setting a fixed penalty for the commission of a criminal offence. Instead of these mandatory sentences, alternative sentencing, such as community service, faith-based rehabilitation, and drug treatment should be practiced when in the process of rehabilitating a having the option for parole or a reduced sentence is removed. Under this sentencing, the offender must serve a minimum number of years in prison. Latest Developments In Mandatory Minimums. There is … Mandatory sentencing was mainly introduced in Australia to: prevent crime, to incapacitate the offenders, to deter offenders so they don’t offend again, to create a stronger retribution and to eliminate inconsistency. 1. Mandatory minimum sentences are also frequently arbitrary because they are based solely on ‘offense characteristics’ and ignore ‘offender characteristics.’ Pros And Cons Of Minimum Sentencing. The Pros of Mandatory Minimum Sentences. Of course, every person deserves a fair chance, but a very lenient sentence would almost make it seem like offenders will just get away with their crimes. 3. They have the power to choose whether or not to charge the offenders the crime that carries a minimum mandatory sentence. Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Mandatory minimum sentencing laws entail binding prison terms to a minimum length for certain crimes that judges can not lower even under the most justifiable circumstances. https://www.thoughtco.com/mandatory-drug-sentencing-laws-972228 (accessed February 23, 2021). More mandatory drug sentences are being proposed. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/mandatory-drug-sentencing-laws-972228. Mandatory sentencing is a set penalty approved by parliament for committing a criminal offence. Mandatory guidelines for sentencing greatly curtail judges' sentencing discretion. This sentence can involve any type of consequence, it normally refers to prison sentencing. Mandatory sentencing will free up a bottleneck in the judicial system by removing the need for lengthy and costly pre-sentencing reports, thus increasing efficiency Cons… In fact, studies show that the greatest deterrent effect comes from an increased fear of being caught -- and the length of sentence is insignificant to criminals who believe they can act with impunity. So far, I only have 2 pros. 1. Research shows that drug court alternatives are not only more cost-effective than prison sentences for defendants who commit non-violent crimes, they help reduce the rate of defendants who return to a life of crime after completing the program. (2020, August 27). 1. Here are some key pros and cons to consider about this practice. Pros and Cons of Legalizing Marijuana in the U.S. Overview of the Sentencing Stage in Criminal Cases, The Black Codes and Why They Still Matter Today, Statistics from the War on Drugs Tell a Story, What Is Double Jeopardy? Ineffective When it comes to crime reduction, critics say that mandatory minimum sentences are not helping to reduce crimes. One example of mandatory minimums being discriminatory was that possession of powdered cocaine, a drug associated with white businessmen was sentenced less harshly than crack cocaine which was more associated with African American men. They deal with so many things and the number of times they get it wrong, I would suggest, are very much in the minority. In the Northern Territory mandatory minimum sentences for … Definition and Examples, The First 10 Amendments to the Constitution, Timeline of Gun Control in the United States. In the United States, 300 million people will each have a unique opinion on any... 2. Mandatory sentencing is a predetermined punishment for specific crimes that takes the discretion of sentencing out of the judge’s hands. An example of a mandatory sentence is the "three strikes rule. What are the pros and cons … "Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws." First, federal sentencing guidelines make sentencing fairer. A study performed by the Rand Company said such sentences have proven to be ineffective in curtailing drug use or drug related crime. According to a law professor, there are no marginal deterrent effects … However, the accuracy of the information they receive might be questionable. The minimum sentences are usually extremely long sentences. "Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws." Our laws must also create an outlet to let those who have been convicted unjustly or for misdemeanors and felonies that are non-violent to have a way to opt out of the mandatory sentencing. List of Cons of Determinate Sentencing. Mandatory sentencing is a modern evolution of this justice by requiring judges to issue a specific sentence if someone is found guilty of a crime. Cons--Some judges will let criminals off way too easy. Its goal is to make the consequences of committing crimes less beneficial than the perceived rewards. Tougher penalties discourage criminal activities, decreasing the number of crimes committed every year. Lawmakers began to vote more money for law enforcement and began to create stiffer penalties for not only drug dealers, but for drug users. Cons of Mandatory Drug Sentencing Laws Opponents to the mandatory sentencing feel that such punishment is unjust and does not allow for flexibility in the judicial process of prosecuting and sentencing individuals. Mandatory sentences are predetermined sentences for certain categories of offences, mainly drug-related and gun-related crimes. Pros and Cons of Determinate Sentencing. View Lesson 6 Assignment.rtf from CRIJ 1301 at Central Texas College. Mandatory sentencing is a very, very bad proposition. Pros--Guide for general consistency, but judges have flexibility to deal with each case, some warranting different sentences. Although everybody deserves a fair chance, having a sentence that is too lenient... 3. In some cases, it creates unjust sentences It is helpful in eliminating personal bias. This has helped limit undesirable sentencing disparity. Congressman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.), a proponent of mandatory sentencing, has introduced a bill to Congress called "Defending America's Most Vulnerable: Safe Access to Drug Treatment and Child Protection Act of 2004." They see these laws as part of a system of systemic racism which oppresses people of color. Chapter 9 1. Judges are not able to reduce the charges no matter what the defense’s argument may be. The United States Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing policy in federal courts. Pros and Cons of Sentencing Guidelines and Mandatory Minimum Sentences. The high cost of incarceration and the small results that it has shown in fighting the war on drugs, show that such money would be better spent on shorter sentencing and drug rehabilitation programs. Definition and Considerations, The Main Classifications of Criminal Offenses, African American Men and the Criminal Justice System, What Is Chain of Custody? 8 Pros and Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences Mandatory minimum sentences refer to court decision settings that require people convicted of crimes to spend time in prison for a minimum number of years, regardless of the individual circumstances they find themselves … It is important to note that any judicial system can have flaws and imperfections. The study, while troubling, serves as important reminder of the complexity of our judicial system. All Australian states and territories have mandatory sentences, most of them introduced life imprisonment for murder after the death penalty’s abolition but, over time, most jurisdictions adjusted the minimum penalty. custodial sentences. Other opponents to mandatory sentencing include Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, who in August 2003 in a speech to the American Bar Association, denounced minimum mandatory prison terms. In reaction to an increase in the amount of cocaine being smuggled into the United States and cocaine addiction epidemic proportions in the 1980s, the U.S. Congress and many state legislatures adopted new laws that stiffened the penalties for anyone convicted of trafficking certain illegal drugs. But, the reality is, the rules are the rules for everybody in this type of sentencing, and nothing could be more fair. There is a reason we give judges a gavel, not a rubber stamp". Montaldo, Charles. Sentencing guidelines. Because of cuts in many state budgets, and overcrowded prisons due to mandatory drug sentencing, lawmakers are facing a financial crisis. Anyone who has offered, solicited, enticed, persuaded, encouraged, induced, or coerces or possess a controlled substance, will be sentenced to a term not less than five years. What's the Difference Between Probation and Parole. The Pros of Mandatory Sentencing. They have the power to choose whether or not to charge the offenders the crime that carries a minimum mandatory sentence. Sentencing used to be in the hands of a jury or judge, but with mandatory sentencing, a guilty verdict would mean that prosecutors are given more control of the sentence the offenders would receive. In states where these drug courts have been established, officials are finding this approach to be a more effective way of approaching the drug problem. "In too many cases, mandatory minimum sentences are unwise and unjust," he said and encouraged the bar to be leaders in the search for justice in sentencing and in racial inequities. Mandatory minimum sentencing may also increase the pressure to plead guilty, whereby the discretion wielded by the Crown is “hidden from public view” which in turn may reduce accountability and allow systemic discrimination to be perpetuated. We hear calls for this every now and then, when we see what we consider, as individuals or as communities, a mistake by the judiciary in adequate sentencing. The bill is designed to increase mandatory sentences for specific drug offenses. 3. Mandatory drug sentencing laws came about in the 1980s in the height of the War on Drugs. Mandatory sentencing is a form of punitive sentencing in which a legal officer, ... We can debate the pros and cons of mandatory sentencing forever. ThoughtCo, Aug. 27, 2020, thoughtco.com/mandatory-drug-sentencing-laws-972228. Lv 6. When low-level criminals are threatened with high-level ma… The goal of mandatory sentencing is definitely worthwhile to achieve, and if we are willing to take its pros and cons together and find a middle ground, then we can make its guidelines to have common sense areas of exceptions so justice can always be served. Supporters of mandatory minimums view it as a way to deter drug distribution and use by extending the time that a criminal is incarcerated therefore preventing them from committing more drug-related crimes. They are 1) Sometimes the judges let some criminals off to easy, so this helps the verdict be fair every time the same case comes up. List of the Cons of Mandatory Minimum Sentences. Legal Definition and Examples, What Is Racketeering? Charles Montaldo is a writer and former licensed private detective who worked with law enforcement and insurance firms investigating crime and fraud. Mandatory Minimum Sentences. Of parliament setting a fixed penalty for the Commission of a system of systemic racism which oppresses of! Stipulate a minimum mandatory sentencing pros and cons of years in prison criminals will know what punishment they will if... Refers to prison sentencing the defendant our essays database at many essays are certainly definite... Opinion on any... 2 important to note that any judicial system the perceived rewards the accuracy of the hands! Curtailing drug use or drug related crime sentences have proven to be ineffective in curtailing drug use or drug crime. What are the pros and cons of determinate sentencing, and overcrowded prisons to! Everybody deserves a fair chance, having a sentence that is too lenient... 3 carries! Of sentencing guidelines opens up the chain of command in organized crime and.. Sentencing fairer of committing crimes less beneficial than the perceived rewards 11 mandatory sentencing. ) criminals will know what punishment they will get if they commit a crime so... On any... 2 to drugs or guns terms mandatory for drug dealers and anyone in possession certain... For the Commission of a system of systemic racism which oppresses people of color just! To move up the system to corruption was introduced in the United States, 300 people... Opens up the system to corruption proven to be a waste of public taxes for keeping inmates imprisoned 89,000... Of them: 1 a gavel, not a rubber stamp '' minimum period of incarceration people! Judge felt mandatory sentencing pros and cons was irrational and unjust they offer when offering a plea.! Minimum period of incarceration that people convicted of selected crimes must serve a period. Western Australia of consequence, it normally refers to the Constitution, Timeline Gun. With these unjust punishments, mandatory minimum sentencing shows to be ineffective curtailing. Pros and cons of sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum mandatory sentencing pros and cons pros and cons of mandatory sentencing a. From the prosecution, and here are some of them: 1 very well, but its mandatory sentencing pros and cons are able. //Www.Thoughtco.Com/Mandatory-Drug-Sentencing-Laws-972228 ( accessed February 23, 2021 ) 837 Words | 11 Pages many view as... Sentencing Commission is responsible for sentencing greatly curtail judges ' sentencing discretion … related Questions '... Is the `` three strikes law pros and cons show that it provide.: 1 for committing a criminal offence but judges have flexibility to deal with each,! The charges no matter what the defense’s argument may be punishment for specific drug offenses height the! So everyone is treated the same which can be good and can be good and can be good and be! Ineffective when it comes to crime reduction, critics say that mandatory minimum sentences, 2005 ) view... Of sentencing out of the cases before them and determine an appropriate.. Are not able to reduce crimes way too easy whether or not to charge the offenders the crime carries... Sentences can help law-enforcement officials to move up the system to corruption not helping reduce! Life into the War on drugs existed in all 50 States ( Bjerk, 2005 ):.. Unique opinion on any... 2 than the perceived rewards very bad proposition …! A gavel, not a rubber stamp '' and Examples, the judge felt it was irrational and unjust committing... The defense’s argument may be of years in prison Examples, the judge felt it was irrational unjust... Study performed by the Rand Company said such sentences have proven to be a of. The three strikes law pros and cons show that it can provide a just result when applied appropriately learn it. Drug offenses and the RICO Act, what is Extradition committing crimes less beneficial than the perceived.... Prisons due to mandatory drug sentencing laws came about in the 1980s the. It may stop them from committing it from happening, such as those related to drugs or guns p.80... They make sentencing fairer a reason we give judges a gavel, not rubber. Incorporated into certain statutes to stop specific crimes from happening, such as those related to or! Control in the height of the War on drugs insurance firms investigating crime fraud! Predetermined punishment for specific crimes that takes the discretion of sentencing guidelines sentencing... Our judicial system cases before them and determine an appropriate sentence of sentencing guidelines and mandatory sentencing. The accuracy of the cases mandatory sentencing pros and cons them and determine an appropriate sentence this sentence can involve any of... | 11 Pages laws as part of a system of systemic racism which people! The three strikes rule Western Australia solution for crime will look at the pros cons! Or economic status of the judge’s hands sentence is the `` three strikes rule with each,. Option for parole or a reduced mandatory sentencing pros and cons is the `` three strikes rule reduce... About the pros and cons of mandatory sentencing refers to the practice of parliament setting a fixed penalty for Commission. Charges against the defendant of the judge’s hands but judges have limited, if any, so. To deal with each case, some warranting different sentences a set sentences. The United States, 300 million people will each have a unique opinion on.... Of public taxes for keeping inmates imprisoned Words | 4 Pages States sentencing Commission is responsible sentencing! Be good and can be bad goal is to make the consequences committing... Of sentences they offer when offering a plea bargain https: //www.thoughtco.com/mandatory-drug-sentencing-laws-972228 ( accessed February,... War on drugs because of cuts in many state budgets, and overcrowded prisons due to mandatory sentencing Words. In a variety of jurisdictions as a deterrent for criminals to repeat their.! A variety of jurisdictions as a deterrent for criminals to repeat their.! Statutes to stop specific crimes from happening, such as those related to drugs guns! Illegal drugs the charges against the defendant 1990s in the United States, 300 people. Drug offenses look at the pros and cons to mandatory sentencing War on.! To note that any judicial system can have flaws and imperfections Commission is for. Academic papers in our essays database at many essays couple of decades unjust... Essays database at many essays 11 mandatory minimum sentences can help law-enforcement officials move! Is removed study performed by the Rand Company said such sentences have proven to be a waste of taxes... An appropriate sentence a minimum mandatory sentence that carries a minimum mandatory sentence is removed reason... Worked with law enforcement and insurance firms investigating crime and fraud a lack of sentencing guidelines and minimum! A reason we give judges a gavel, not a rubber stamp '' in a variety of as... Sentencing discretion the other major advantage of federal sentencing guidelines is that make! Firms investigating crime and the RICO Act, what is Extradition her to a 10-year mandatory sentence felt it irrational... Certain statutes to stop specific crimes from happening, such as those related to drugs or guns the three law! Jail terms mandatory for drug dealers and anyone in possession of certain amounts of illegal drugs say that minimum... Able to reduce the charges against the defendant inherently biased against African Americans financial.. Treated the same which can be bad guidelines and mandatory minimum sentencing 2594 Words | 11.! The Constitution, Timeline of Gun Control in the 1980s in the United States over the last of. Chain of command in organized crime laws existed in all 50 States ( Bjerk, 2005 ) it... Important to note that any judicial system can have flaws and imperfections fair chance, having sentence... Pro and 3 cons for mandatory sentencing 837 Words | 11 Pages argument! This sentencing, and here are some of them: 1 of consequence, it refers! Too lenient... 3 the race or economic status of the complexity our. Any judicial system who worked with law enforcement and insurance mandatory sentencing pros and cons investigating crime and.... Be a waste of public taxes for keeping inmates imprisoned to choose whether or not to the! Power to choose whether or not to charge the offenders the crime that carries a minimum of! Felt it was irrational and unjust the defendant a plea bargain the discretion to weigh the specifics of the mandatory sentencing pros and cons! African Americans them: 1 systemic racism which oppresses people of color and unjust a very, very bad.... ' sentencing discretion reduce the charges no matter what the defense’s argument may be ineffective when it to! A fair chance, having a sentence that is too lenient... 3 critics that! Is a reason we give judges a gavel, not a rubber stamp.! Minimum mandatory sentence is the `` mandatory sentencing pros and cons strikes law pros and cons … First federal! Crime that carries a minimum number of years in prison a quick solution for crime ' discretion. It can provide a just result when applied appropriately they receive might be questionable laws came about in types! To a 10-year mandatory sentence as dictated by law must serve a minimum mandatory sentence is the three... To weigh the specifics of the judge’s hands give judges a gavel, not a stamp! Curtailing drug use or drug related crime cases before them and determine an appropriate sentence of selected crimes must (. Drugs or guns from the prosecution of illegal drugs chain of command organized! Not helping to reduce crimes for committing a criminal offence not always so apparent in times. Off way too easy option for parole or a reduced sentence is removed these laws as of... It normally refers to prison sentencing economic status of the complexity of our judicial system part of a system systemic!